Nose Cone Bluntess Exploration
This Extended Essay investigates how the bluntness of a power-series nose cone influences the drag force acting on it in controlled airflow. Motivated by early misconceptions about sharp vs. blunt noses and a growing interest in aerodynamics, the research focuses on understanding why certain shapes perform better in subsonic conditions. Since standard power-series “n-values” couldn’t be directly reproduced in a classroom experiment, the study introduces an innovative workaround: using slopes of tangents at evenly spaced points on each cone to quantify bluntness. Five nose cones—ranging from cylindrical (0.00) to sharply pointed (1.00)—were tested in a custom wind-tunnel setup, with drag measured through a Vernier force probe and later converted into coefficients of drag. The experiment draws heavily on prior analyses by Rathi, Milligan, and Shah for comparison and validation.
The results strongly confirm the hypothesis that moderately blunt nose cones outperform both the sharpest and most blunt extremes. Both the experimental data and referenced studies show a clear minimum in drag coefficient at the 0.25 power-series cone, indicating that a slightly rounded tip guides airflow more smoothly and minimizes pressure differentials. Cylindrical and fully pointed cones showed the highest drag, aligning with aerodynamic theory around laminar flow disruption and form drag. While some discrepancies arose due to differences in wind speed, materials, and the necessity of merging data from multiple sources, the overall trend remains consistent and robust. The essay concludes that moderate bluntness provides the most efficient aerodynamic performance at subsonic speeds—an insight applicable to aircraft, rockets, and any design concerned with minimizing drag.
Contact through email for full paper.